Introduction: Masculinity, Politics and Soviet Russian Detektiv Literature
In a famous and much-lampooned episode from Iulian Semenov’s World War Two spy novel Semnadtsatʹ mgnovenii vesny (Seventeen Moments of Spring, 1968), Soviet intelligence agent Maksim Isaev, who is working undercover in Berlin as SS officer Max Otto von Shtirlits, warns his pregnant radio operator Katia Kozlova (another Soviet agent, living in Nazi Germany under the assumed name Kathe Kien) about the dangers of giving birth.
‘You see, women cry out during confinement.’
‘Thank you,’ commented Kathe with a smile, ‘I thought they sang songs.’
Shtirlits shook his head with a sigh. ‘You see, my dear, the trouble is they cry out in their mother tongue, in the dialect of the place they were born in. So you’ll start screaming “Mama” in your best Ryazan accent…’1
His fears are realised when she subsequently goes into labour; and after a midwife informs the Gestapo he must draw on all his heroic resourcefulness to rescue Kathe and her infant from the Nazis’ clutches, spiriting them off to Switzerland without revealing his own true nature to the enemy.
This episode, in which Kathe is betrayed by her female biological makeup, serves to remind us that there was little place for women within the world of spies and intelligence agents, criminals and police officers that was constructed in Soviet Russian detektiv literature.2 As Anthony Olcott notes, ‘the genre was virtually a male domain’ throughout the Soviet period,3 dominated by a succession of male authors who created a string of male protagonists to star as their heroes.4 Female characters only played minor supporting roles in this overwhelmingly masculine literary endeavour: romantic interests or wives or victims of crime or (like Kathe) assistants to the central male heroes.5
Of course, the gendered nature of the literary form was not something widely discussed among critics and commentators. Soviet teachings that the USSR had achieved gender equality – a situation memorably described by Igor Kon as ‘official sexlessness’6 – meant that such issues could not be raised easily in public, state-mediated discourse. Instead, the critical exegesis focused narrowly on prevailing political teachings. In particular, the central guiding principle for detektiv authors and critics was Marxist-Leninist criminology, which from the 1930s onward maintained that crime was a manifestation of class struggle and exploitation. Because antagonistic classes had already been eliminated in the Soviet Union, this left only foreign interference and residual bourgeois mentality as causes for criminality both in Soviet society and in Soviet Russian detektiv literature.7
The task of the detektiv author, then, was to depict ‘the war that our
people and government are waging against the very roots of exploitative
psychology in all its forms’8 – against foreign spies, saboteurs and
domestic recidivists, all of whom are motivated by ideologies hostile to
socialism.9 According to Nikolai Toman’s
classic 1960 formulation,
Our detektiv literature must not only show how crime is solved but
also confirm the Soviet way of life; teach intolerance to any manifestations of
the vestiges of capitalism in people’s minds, in everyday life, in economics;
[and] provide inspiration for the battle against these vestiges to become
a matter for the people as a whole.10
In doing so, the genre was to be fashioned into a ‘sharp ideological
weapon’ for propagating the ideology of State socialism, presenting an
‘effective means of action on the mind and heart of the
If we extend this understanding of Russian detektiv literature into the realm of gender, we could conclude that the forms of masculinity depicted within the genre were constructed in terms of service to the State. The male heroes – who always worked in groups because crime solving was ‘the complex at times dangerous labour of an entire collective’12 – acted primarily to protect the people and Party, and their very power to perform this function was conferred on them by the State.13 They were uniformly steadfast and brave and honest, totally committed to their duty and to the Marxist-Leninist principles upon which this duty is founded. In contrast, criminals were by definition enemies of socialism. Overall, masculinity was organised along (or subsumed by) the political axis of official/dissident, authorised/unauthorised.14
The post-Soviet Russian detektiv revival
The orthodox political orientation of Soviet Russian detektiv
literature became a tremendous liability when perestroika was ushered in by
Mikhail Gorbachev and the truth behind Soviet crime, policing and the
intelligence apparatus started to appear. In 1987 critic Viktor Toporov gave
voice to the new reality in which the genre found itself, declaring that:
What were until very recently the firm postulates of our ‘native’
[otechestvennyi] detektiv – the absence of organised crime in
our country, for example, and the absolute incorruptibility of all
representatives of the law enforcement organs, not to mention other officials
– have turned out to be merely the fig leaves upon which so many authors
hurriedly affixed their signatures.15
Writers such as Leonid Slovin, Arkadii and Georgii Vainer attempted
to rectify the situation in their work, creating new heroes who struggled to
fight the crime and corruption perpetrated by their co-workers. Despite their
best efforts, though, readers turned away from Russian detektiv
literature and towards its Western equivalents, which had previously been
either banned or heavily controlled. In the first years after the Soviet
Union’s collapse, books by foreign crime authors such as James Hadley Chase,
Arthur Conan Doyle, Ian Fleming, and Agatha Christie grew to account for some
70–80% of all detektivy published in Russia.16 Addressing this
situation in 1995, critic Roman Arbitman declared that Russian
detektiv literature had been ‘killed off’ by the revelations that
emerged during perestroika, and any attempt to resurrect it was ‘futile
a priori’.17 Arbitman’s prognosis was at the very least somewhat
premature, though, as already the signs of an extraordinary turnaround in
Russian detektiv were visible. Over the next three years, Russian
authors took over their foreign counterparts in popularity and
sales,18 and indeed the sudden
success of Russian detektiv became a much-analysed cultural
phenomenon, with critics and commentators putting forward innumerable theories
as to why it occurred.19
The post-Soviet Russian detektiv revival can be traced back to 1994, when Viktor Dotsenko first started to win a large audience for his series of novels about heroic crime-fighter Savelii Govorkov, who goes by the pseudonym ‘Beshenyi’ (‘The Wild One’). Within two years Dotsenko’s blend of fast-paced action, extreme violence, advanced weaponry and sex was being embraced by millions of readers, and he was identified among the most popular authors in Russia.20 A slew of others adopted his approach, including Danil Koretskii, Sergei Taranov, Vasilii Golovachev, Viktor Pronin, and Aleksandr Bushkov, and the so-called ‘boevik’ became established as the most prominent detektiv sub-genre.
To define the boevik concisely is a difficult task. It is more than anything a form of tightly plotted adventure literature that unfolds through action, where the reader focuses on the mystery of ‘what will happen next’. In contrast, the traditional detective story (from which the detektiv genre originally borrowed its name) unfolds through solving the mystery of ‘what happened before’ – the causes (the motive and perpetrator) behind a mysterious consequence (a crime). The typical boevik novel follows a warrior hero – a ‘hero-in-action’21 – who fights evils through superior strength and firepower rather than superior investigative ability.22 Its basic plot involves some villain who plans to commit a large-scale crime or terrorist act and is pursued by the hero, who kills the villain’s minions and then foils the scheme, destroying the villain in the penultimate scene.23 Perhaps the closest terminological equivalent in English would be ‘action-thriller’.24
The central feature of the sub-genre that is pertinent for the purposes of this discussion, is its masculine orientation. The boevik novels that comprised the first wave of the Russian detektiv resurgence were all written by men and about men, thus continuing the gendered pattern that had established during the Soviet period. Furthermore, anecdotal and (limited) empirical evidence on reader tastes suggests strongly that men comprise the core boevik readership.25
The boevik’s masculine nature was underscored when a second – female – wave of Russian authors emerged to engage with detektiv. Aleksandra Marinina led the way, and her series of novels about criminal analyst Nastia Kamenskaia sold in huge quantities between 1996 and 1997.26 After several others followed her success – including Marina Serova, Anna Malysheva, Darʹia Dontsova, Tatʹiana Poliakova, and Polina Dashkova27 – critics moved to distinguish between the ‘traditionally male world of Russian detektiv’28 and the newly minted ‘zhenskii’ (women’s) detektiv.29 The gender distinction also quickly became encoded in the marketing of the two sub-genres. Works of zhenskii detektiv appeared in dedicated series with names such as Detektiv glazami zhenshchiny (Detektiv Through a Woman’s Eyes), Damskie prikoly (Ladies’ Escapades), Detektiv chitaet zhenshchina (The Woman Reads Detektiv) and Detektiv diva (Divas of Detektiv). At the same time the male-oriented boevik novels found an outlet in series including Muzhskoe delo (Men’s Business), Chestʹ i sila (Honour and Strength), Ironicheskii avantiurnyi boevik dlia muzhchin (Ironic Adventure Boevik for Men), and Spetsnaz GRU (Special Forces of the Chief Intelligence Directorate).30
The boevik and the anxiety of reconstructing Russian masculinity
Many other sub-genres comprise the contemporary Russian detektiv landscape, some of which can be traced back through the Soviet period and some of which have only recently emerged, but the boevik and zhenskii detektiv – the first two waves of the post-Soviet Russian detektiv revival – are still the most prominent among them. Moreover, they are by far the two most explicitly gendered Russian detektiv sub-genres, identified firmly with male and female authors, male and female readers, male and female interests.
This gendered identification – which is so strong that it forms a fundamental element of the generic specificity of the boevik and zhenskii detektiv – suggests that the two sub-genres can provide insights into the gender issues facing contemporary Russian society. Indeed, an increasing number of scholars are focusing on zhenskii detektiv and the way it engages with discourses of femininity, including ‘the change in […] concepts of the woman’s social role’31 and the emerging conflict ‘with the conventions and defined roles of patriarchal society’.32 However, I have been unable to identify any similar research that tackles directly the boevik and the discourses of masculinity encoded within it.
One of the central issues informing the constructions of masculinity that emerges in early post-Soviet Russian boevik literature is the quest to move beyond the discredited official/dissident dichotomy that saw Soviet detektiv heroes defined primarily by their service to State socialism. The collapse of the coercive censorship apparatus and the State’s broader retreat from attempting to control many spheres of Russian social, cultural and intellectual life has created a vastly different, more open and more free discursive landscape for boevik authors to explore in reconstructing Russian masculinity. At the same time, though, the absence of firm guidelines governing what should replace political affiliation as the organising principle for this reconstructive project appears to have fomented a certain amount of anxiety among the authors, and this anxiety is betrayed in their works.33
In this essay I present an analysis of Viktor Dotsenko’s Beshenyi series – the series that in many respects sparked Russian engagement with the boevik sub-genre and established its major conventions – in order to uncover these processes at work. More specifically, I focus on his central hero Savelii Govorkov: a protagonist who, imbued with all the masculine traits Dotsenko believes are needed for a Russian champion to triumph over evil in the post-Soviet epoch, embodies both the author’s attempt to reconstruct post-Soviet Russian masculinity and the anxieties that emerge from this attempt.
Savelii Govorkov, super man
Most episodes of the series open with a brief introduction in which Dotsenko
explains his central hero’s life story for the first-time reader.
Savelii Kuzʹmich Govorkov was born in 1965. At the age of three he became an
orphan. Children’s home, workers’ dormitory, army,
in Afghanistan, several wounds. He was wrongly imprisoned, then rehabilitated,
headed again of his own volition into the Afghan hellfire, suffered another
serious wound […].
The first book of the series, Srok dlia Beshenogo (Beshenyi’s
Sentence, 1994), introduces us to Savelii during the late Soviet period when
he has been wrongfully imprisoned for currency speculation. He manages to
escape from the prison camp and return to Moscow and avenge himself on the
criminals who set him up, in the process clearing his name. Savelii is unable
to readjust to ‘normal’ Soviet life, though, and so in the second book
– Tridtsatogo unichtozhitʹ! (Destroy the Thirtieth! 1994)
– he reenlists in the army to return to Afghanistan, where ‘everything is
clear: there is your enemy, and here is your brother in arms.’35 He
is wounded and captured during a fight, escapes his Afghan captors, is found by
Tibetan monks and meets the Teacher (Uchitelʹ), who reveals to him the
mystic Oriental arts of war. When he finally leaves after five years, the
Teacher explains to him that:
[…] your country, the country in which you appeared on this earth, the country
which gave you life, which nurtured you – this country is now in trouble and it
needs your help!36
Savelii returns to Russia, where he is tricked into training soldiers
at a secret criminal base in Kazakhstan (he is led to believe that they are KGB
agents) for the August 1991 Putsch, but he discovers the truth and foils the
criminals’ plans, killing several of them and foiling the coup.
The basic pattern of the Beshenyi series is thus established: Savelii saving
Russia from serious threats through his heroic actions. As Boris Dubin writes,
‘The starting point, the conceptual core of action […] is an awareness of
disorder in the country.’37 Savelii is driven to put an end to this disorder, to rebuild the great
Russian nation that has suffered so much. This task is located firmly in the
domain of men – a point made explicit on the back cover of every book found in
the boevik series Muzhskoe delo (which is produced by
Dotsenko’s publisher Vagrius and mines the same thematic seams that Dotsenko
When the law is powerless they convene their own court. Superdetectives and
elite warriors, people simply reduced to despair by criminal disorder. It is
their choice. It is men’s business…
It follows, of course, that all Savelii’s foes – from criminals to
former KGB agents to corrupt politicians to Chechen warlords to the Secret
Order of Masons – are also men. And Savelii’s allies who help him to shoulder
this weighty burden of protecting Russia are all men too.
The first man to join Savelii’s quest is his close friend Major Andrei Voronov, who served with him in Afghanistan and took part in foiling the attempted coup. He quickly finds another ally in FSB General Mikhail Bogomolov, a soldier dedicated to battling crime and corruption. Both are members of the Russian security organs, and frequently contact Savelii when serious situations threaten the country. However, Savelii himself is not actually in their employ, as he never officially rejoins the service of the Russian state after returning from his second mission to Afghanistan. Inverting the gender order that structured male action in Soviet Russian detektiv literature, Savelii is an autonomous hero whose authority to perform his heroic duty is derived only from himself, from the duty he feels.
In his autonomous role as a necessary adjunct to the Russian law-enforcement establishment, defending the interests of Russia rather than the interests of the State (though the two do intersect), Savelii possesses far more power than any government representative. For example, when special forces troops fail to rescue the President of Russia’s daughter from a hijacked ocean liner in Voina Beshenogo (Beshenyi’s War, 2000), Savelii is asked to deal with the situation. When NATO troops bomb Serbian military positions during the Kosovo conflict in Pravosudie Beshenogo (Beshenyi’s Justice, 1999), Savelii is the only man who can be entrusted to deliver the secret document approving the Russian takeover of Pristina airport, and he leads the convoy of Russian peacekeepers into Kosovo – an operation that he is told ‘couldn’t have happened without you’.38 When the Russian military need to capture a Chechen warlord in Okhota Beshenogo (Beshenyi’s Hunt, 1999), they bring in Savelii to assemble and lead the team. Savelii stands at the apex of male power in the novels, never relying on anything more than his own abilities, and unbound by anything except the responsibility he feels for his motherland.
It must be noted, though, that Savelii is armed with more than simply superior
fighting skills. During the time he spends among the Tibetan monks in
Tridtsatogo unichtozhitʹ, the Teacher imparts special powers to him
and admits him into a Cosmic Brotherhood of mystical warriors for good, telling
For five years I have shared with you my knowledge, developed your spirit and
your body. I was not mistaken: you have become one of my most able pupils.
Your spirit is stronger and you can now find your own way independently without
my help. I’ve taught you to master your body, and now it is protected from the
harmful effects of poisons, fire and steel. Your body can survive a long time
without food and water. You know the secret of the sun, of fire, of water and
wood. You possess the ability to cure yourself and your close
He is able to communicate with the Teacher through the Cosmos to seek
help when needed, and his powers develop as the series progresses. In short,
Savelii is more than a hero: he is a superhero.
The thirteenth book of the series, Kremlevskoe delo Beshenogo (Beshenyi’s Kremlin Case, 2000), provides several excellent examples illustrating how Savelii employs his superpowers. Savelii is summoned to meet President Boris Yeltsin, who asks him to investigate the rumours that his inner circle – the so-called Family – are involved in corruption. At the same time, the Secret Order of Masons is plotting a terror campaign. Savelii delivers proof of the corruption to Yeltsin, and then receives a sudden telepathic message from the Teacher informing him that a bomb has been planted in a Moscow hotel. ‘Your country needs your help! Now, like never before, dark forces of evil have united to force Russia to its knees.’40 Savelii is able to locate the bomb in time and channels mystical energy from the Teacher to defuse it. Meanwhile, Yeltsin has confronted the Family with the proof of their misdeeds and demands they resign. In turn, the Family develop a plan to over-medicate Yeltsin and then have him killed in surgery. Again, Savelii receives a telepathic warning from the Teacher: ‘Once more your country is threatened, by a danger far worse than the bomb you defused […]. A plot has been hatched against your President in which doctors are taking part, breaking the first law of medicine – “Do no harm.” ’41 Savelii is able to stop the plot and save Yeltsin, who then hands over power to Vladimir Putin so that the war against corruption can continue.
His superhuman abilities are an important tool in Savelii’s struggle; Dotsenko explains that ‘a normal man would not have the strength’ to endure the ‘difficult and dangerous’ path that Savelii has taken.42 At the same time, then, these superhuman abilities also represent an important manifestation of the anxiety that accompanies the reconstruction of Russian masculinities in Dotsenko’s novels. For any ‘normal man,’ wielding autonomous power is simply not enough in and of itself to end the post-Soviet disorder and rebuild the Russian nation. Victory ultimately can only be attained through means that do not exist in reality. Dotsenko’s reconstruction of heroic Russian masculinity his boevik series is thus removed from the world: Savelii represents the ideal male that Dotsenko believes is needed in contemporary Russia, but his male power is an unattainable fantasy.
A woman’s place
The major role for women in the Beshenyi series is as willing sexual partners
for Savelii – a role analogous to that of the female assistants and romantic
interests that populated Soviet-era Russian detektiv. They find it
impossible to resist him, suffering an almost involuntary attraction. When he
is lost in the taiga after escaping a prison camp in Srok dlia
Beshenogo, he loses consciousness and is found by a woman named Varia, who
takes him to her cottage to nurse him back to health. She strips the clothes
off his limp body to bathe him, and:
[…] she suddenly encountered his inert organ. Feeling a strange desire, she
carefully washed it with her cloth and then cleaned it several times more with
soap, stroked it, and then suddenly – surprising even herself – bent forward
and pressed it to her lips.43
Even with insensible body and flaccid penis, Savelii’s potent Russian
manhood is asserted: Varia leans over and whispers, ‘Thank you, my stranger…
I haven’t been with a man for so long.’ His irresistible attraction is also on
display in Voina Beshenogo when he meets businesswoman Alena. He
offers her a massage that arouses her immediately, and she is soon screaming:
‘Enter me! Enter me all the way! Hurt me! Do it now, do you
At the same time, there is a certain passivity on the part of Savelii in his sexual encounters. He never initiates anything, responding instead to the women’s overtures at every turn. When he meets seductive schoolgirl Larisa in Liubovʹ Beshenogo (Beshenyi’s Love, 1997), for example, ‘she decided immediately that, no matter what happened, he would fuck her today’. She takes him to a hotel room and, when Savelii reaches for the television remote control, she grabs his hand and asks, ‘Have we come here to stare at that box?’ The usual scenes follow as she extracts her pleasure from Savelii, telling him afterward that, ‘It was so great, it was like I’d never been with anyone until I met you!’45
On one level, Savelii’s sexual passivity can be understood as an expression of the self-reliant and autonomous Russian masculine ideal that Dotsenko constructs in his hero. Women are naturally and involuntarily attracted to Savelii because he is the prime specimen of mighty Russian manhood, but he is detached from women in the same way that he is detached from the State – he does not need either in order to ‘be a man’. The idea of transcending physical desire and freeing oneself from being a slave to passion is also highly congruent with the Eastern spirituality from which Savelii purportedly draws his superpowers.
However, when we turn to consider Savelii’s relationship with Rozochka, the young woman who becomes his enduring romantic interest, we uncover a somewhat more complex and ambivalent interaction between sex and masculinity. Rozochka has loved Savelii since she was a girl, and in Liubovʹ Beshenogo she extracts a declaration of love from him, but it is not consummated immediately because Savelii believes she is too young and innocent and ‘must be given the opportunity to learn about herself. To grow up! Otherwise, how could he call himself a man?’46 Several scenes ensue in which Rozochka tries to have sex with Savelii but is repulsed. Finally, in book eleven (Voina Beshenogo), she meets him at a New York airport and demands that he do to her ‘what you’ve denied me for so long’, then drags him to a hotel where she immediately takes charge.
Rozochka wrapped her legs around Savelii’s waist, and it seemed that his aroused flesh was about to plunge between her hungering thighs – but Savelii was still unresolved to take the final step: he feared that he would harm her when he broke once and for all her delicate hymen, the symbol of her purity and innocence…
Rozochka herself took this final step. She guided Savelii’s swollen flesh with her hand and thrust sharply to meet it. This thrust was so unexpected for him that he only understood what had happened once he felt himself fully inside his beloved.47
Thus the traditional deflowering of the woman by the man is in a sense reversed, with Rozochka using Savelii to penetrate herself.
The sexual passivity that Savelii exhibits with Rozochka cannot be described simply as a symptom of detachment. Throughout the later books of the series we are told repeatedly that he loves her very much and thinks about her all the time. Instead, I would argue that it is submissive: Savelii abandons all autonomous action and initiative once Rozochka corners him in the bedroom. This submissive sexual role is most often associated with women rather than ‘real’ Russian men,48 and reveals a further significant aspect of the anxiety that accompanies the new forms of Russian masculinity being articulated in Dotsenko’s novels: profound unease about how male–female relationships are to be reconstructed within the unfamiliar landscape of post-Soviet gender politics. Not sure of how a ‘real man’ should behave in sexual matters, Savelii takes the safest course by becoming a hero-in-inaction.
Maintaining heterosexuality under suspicious circumstances
More than this, Savelii’s copious sexual exploits – which very rarely play any role in the narrative proper – also betray an anxiety about male–male relationships that should be examined more closely.
As we have seen, although Savelii is the focus of the series there are also many other male characters, who form close-knit bonds with one another as they spend time together preparing for and undertaking dangerous missions. These bonds are often manifested in shows of camaraderie such as that found in the following scene from Tridtsatogo unichtozhitʹ!, when Savelii unexpectedly meets long-lost friend Andrei Voronov in Afghanistan.
Savelii was the first to snap out of his daze: he stepped out of line and threw himself at the captain. They grasped one another firmly in a manly fashion, and then froze in silent embrace.
The deputy to the company commander, Lieutenant Skvortsov, ordered quietly:
The soldiers filed off in a silent and orderly fashion, trying not to interfere with this unexpected meeting of two friends.
‘Good God, how long is it since we’ve seen one another, brother?’ The captain’s eyes immediately became moist. ‘I’d given up hope of ever finding you among the living.’49
Often they are extremely intense, to the point that they even eclipse other bonds such as those of family.50
With all the male bonding that takes place there is strong potential for reading the Beshenyi novels in the ‘wrong’ way – for ‘misinterpreting’ the manly embraces and joyful tears as expressions of homosexuality rather than camaraderie. Dotsenko himself acknowledges this potential (at least on some level) in a passage from Ostrov Beshenogo (Beshenyi’s Island, 2001), where a hired killer named Derek attempts to befriend Savelii by pretending to be on a business trip.
Derek waved a hand. ‘My boss isn’t interested in anything except work, and his assistant is not a personable man. Even with pincers you couldn’t extract a word out of him! So, the fact is that I’m as alone as you are… Perhaps we could unite our respective solitudes?’
‘Maybe this will surprise you but I maintain a traditional orientation!’ said Savelii directly.
‘Good Lord, you thought I was a homosexual?’ Derek laughed heartily. ‘No, I also only love women! I just had a friendly chat in mind. Excuse me if I gave the wrong impression.’
Further to this point, author Baian Shirianov’s recent and now infamous satire on the Beshenyi series, titled Mogila Beshenogo (Beshenyi’s Grave, 2002), contains several homosexual references.51 This is important because literary satire must elicit a recognition reaction in its reworking of the target text, implying that the reading audience is aware of Savelii’s potential sexual ambiguity.
By inserting frequent heterosexual sex scenes between the episodes of all-male action and adventure and camaraderie, Dotsenko is seeking to reinforce his hero’s ‘traditional orientation’ in the face of such potential ‘misinterpretations’. The sex scenes are anxious repetitions of the message that Savelii is heterosexual, and their function is to overwhelm any suspicions that might be arousing by the male bonds at the heart of the narrative proper.
This anxious deployment of heterosexual sex to police male–male relationships is illustrated vividly in Okhota Beshenogo, in a scene where Savelii’s friends Mikhail Gadaev and Oleg Vishnevetskii meet at a Russian bathhouse to discuss the upcoming Chechen mission. Oleg arrives, undresses and enters the bath area to find Mikhail already waiting for him with two naked women. When one of the women leads Oleg to a sauna and starts to massage him, he explains:
‘Listen, I have to be honest, I don’t want any of this. My wife, whom I love very much, is more than enough for me.’
Oleg attempted to move her away.
‘Don’t be crazy! I’m not trying to take her place. I just want to make you feel good.’52
Oleg acquiesces and the requisite sex scenes follow, then Oleg and Mikhail are free to hold their meeting safe in the knowledge that despite being naked in a bathhouse their sexuality has been put beyond suspicion.
The Other side of Russian masculinity
Dotsenko makes clear that the most important rite of passage marking the transition from boy to man is battle. Savelii’s experience as an afganets, a Russian soldier in the Soviet-era Afghanistan conflict, is recounted in a series of flashbacks throughout the series that illustrate its function as his passage into manhood.53 The importance of the baptism under fire is underscored when Savelii rejects a certain Sergei Tepliagov while selecting a team for the upcoming mission to Chechnya in Okhota Beshenogo. Tepliagov ‘served two years in Afghanistan, but never took part in any firefight’,54 so he is not equipped for the trials that the real men must face in the immediate future.
Many of Savelii’s closest friends and brothers in arms such as Aleksandr Matrosov, Oleg Vishnevetskii and Georgii Mordvintsev – men whom he would trust with his life – are also afgantsy. Together they belong to an association of Afghanistan War veterans called Gerat, to which Savelii often turns when he needs extra help in the fight for Russia’s future. In Okhota Beshenogo, Bogomolov pays the organisation the following compliment:
‘Ah, if only I had known in eighty-nine what I know now,’ said Bogomolov with bitterness.
‘Then what?’ asked Savelii point-blank.
‘I would have taken these Afgantsy and created a special division like OMON55 and used it in the fight against organised crime. I’m sure that this crime wave would never have happened.’56
Their experience in the most masculine of theatres – the theatre of war – means that they are better equipped than anyone to deal with the current disorder.
However, the fact of being an afganets presents limited narrative potential for the Beshenyi series: experience in the Afghanistan War can really only function to reinforce the heroic male biography, because the conflict finished before the Soviet Union’s collapse. Luckily for Dotsenko, though, many new conflicts have flared up in the region during the post-Soviet period, giving Savelii and his friends the opportunity to exhibit and reaffirm their manhood on contemporary fields of battle. Most prominent among these conflicts is the ongoing war in Chechnya, which features in several novels from the Beshenyi series and provides the major setting for the ninth episode, Okhota Beshenogo.
This novel opens with General Bogomolov asking Savelii’s help to assassinate an infamous Chechen warlord, arms dealer and criminal named Elʹsan Mushmakaev, who has organised terrorist bombings in Russian cities. Bogomolov cannot draw on his ‘own’ people (FSB agents) for this mission because powerful corrupt forces in Russia are protecting Mushmakaev.
‘Can I ask a question and receive an honest answer?’ asked Savelii, narrowing his eyes.
‘I’ll try,’ replied Bogomolov carefully.
‘Why has this scum remained free for so long? And don’t tell me that it’s impossible to track him down, like they used to say about Dudaev.’
‘Why would say that?’ frowned the General, displeased. ‘[…] Let me explain something: more than once I’ve offered my services, but they told me a categorical “no”.’57
Not being subordinate to anybody or anything, Savelii is able to take on this job that Bogomolov and the Russian State cannot. He puts together a team of afgantsy and many firefights and heroic deeds follow as they make their way to Mushmakaev and capture him. These adventures comprise an excellent proving ground for Savelii’s masculine power on the field of battle; but more than this, they also afford Dotsenko the opportunity to employ the Chechen man as a foil, an Other against which Russian masculinity can be reconstructed on ethnic grounds.
The Chechen men depicted in Okhota Beshenogo are savages and
criminals, not freedom fighters and not Islamic crusaders. We are told that
when the 1994–1996 Chechen conflict broke out Mushmakaev ‘understood nothing
about politics’, but instantly realised that ‘in the rising chaos he could
easily live out his wildest dreams’ and ‘become a hero for things that had
earlier landed him in jail’.58
And his ‘wildest dreams’ for the most part involve raping Russian women.
During one raid,
[…] having seen an attractive [Russian] girl of about fourteen, he began to
have his way with her in front of her tightly bound mother: he raped her, then
inserted a light-bulb into her and shattered the fragile glass. The girl
screamed in pain, after which he pushed the barrel of his pistol up her anus
and pulled the trigger.59
Mushmakaev’s gang is called the Mountain Wolves, and every member
also enjoys raping Russian women and children before handing them over to
Kharon – a Muslim cleric and spiritual guide to the group – to be tortured and
killed.60 Dotsenko laments at the end of the novel that the Russian mass
media too often afford Mushmakaev and his countrymen the chance to air their
views while completely ignoring the fact that ‘these Chechen bandits rape
In constructing the Chechen Other as a savage rapist, Dotsenko reinforces the inherent superiority of the civilised Russian man. More than this, he employs the accusation of rape in order to brush aside the complex political and historical issues surrounding the Chechen conflict and provide a simple, inarguable justification for the actions of his male heroes: the Russian man must defend the Russian woman and child – and ultimately the Russian nation – from the Chechen threat.
However, there is an internal contradiction between these two functions that the Chechen Other performs in Dotsenko’s novels: if the Russian male is superior to the Chechen then why hasn’t the former prevented the latter from raping Russian women and children? That is to say, Dotsenko employs accusations of rape to demonise the Chechen Other and stand him in opposition to the heroic Russian male, but at the same time the fact of the rapes’ occurrence implies that the Russian male has failed in his duty to protect the Russian woman or child. This contradiction is, I would argue, yet another manifestation of the anxiety that emerges from Dotsenko’s attempt to reconstruct post-Soviet Russian masculinity in his boevik novels: it is an anxiety that emerges from the intersection of several discourses – political, ethnic, gender – that make different demands.
In his series of boevik novels, Viktor Dotsenko reconstructs Russian masculinity along very different axes to those employed in Soviet-era detektiv literature. Rather than defining an approved form of masculinity through service to the State, Dotsenko’s masculine ideal encompasses self-reliance and autonomy, camaraderie, virile heterosexuality, ethnic Russianness. At the same time, I have argued that the novels also betray certain anxieties about these traits: about the limits of autonomous power, about the relationships between men and women, about the suspicions of homosexuality that lurk in the shadow of male camaraderie, and about the threats posed by the ethnic Other.
This leads us to wonder at the ultimate locus of these anxieties. They are certainly not limited to masculinities (or more broadly, gender), but rather cut across several axes along which identity is organised, including sexuality and ethnicity. Perhaps they could best be understood as a manifestation of a more general disorientation following the Soviet Union’s collapse, which has left Russians to reconstruct their identities within a shifting discursive landscape that lacks the Soviet ‘anchor’ of officially approved (and coercively enforced) norms. And Russian detektiv in general, as one of the most popular cultural phenomena of the post-Soviet period, is an important forum for this reconstructive project.